Exclusive: Interview with
International Rugby Board chairman Bernard Lapasset
by Colin Spiro 19 November 2008
|

Lapasset: "I am a rugby
man first" |
Part III:
More than just a game
“In the finals of the last two world cups in
2003 and 2007 there has been just one try and people have
played for just not losing the game; we don’t play to win
the game with motion and creativity. We need that.”
In the third and concluding part of our
exclusive interview with Bernard Lapasset we found out what
makes the IRB chairman tick, how best to integrate
Argentina, why the ELVs are proving so contentious and where
he sees the future of his beloved game going.
Being chairman of an international sporting
body is an onerous task, especially in terms of the amount
of time spent travelling, meeting and greeting. There are
endless functions to attend, dignitaries to speak to and
issues to address, especially when trying to drive an
expansionist vision through what some perceive as an archaic
organisation.
The onset of open professionalism, the growth
in popularity of the Rugby World Cup and the push for
Olympic inclusion all mean that Lapasset has a full and
diverse diary which takes him constantly around the globe.
“I have no more house, no more family, no
more team, no more language. My language is different now,
it’s totally changed,” he laments jokingly when reflecting
on his hectic schedule.
“But I am a rugby man first. I like rugby. I
like the atmosphere of rugby and I am sure that rugby is a
good game for the future. I am sure of that,” he adds with
conviction.
Lapasset was once quoted as saying, “We have
the capacity to exist in the world through rugby”, and I
asked him if he still thought this held true.
“Yes, that’s correct. I definitely think
that. Look at my diary…Acapulco, Rome, Russia, Dhaka… every
week I am travelling around the world, but we need that.
“I remember when I started discussions with
the IOC about rugby and they said rugby was just for English
guys. But no more. Rugby is different. It is no more like
that. Rugby is open to a lot of new countries in the world,
speaking English, Spanish, French, Japanese, and Chinese.
“Kazakhstan is a strong Union in rugby and
the Brazilian women won the qualification in Dubai, beating
Argentina in the final. So, for the first time, the
Brazilian women could be in Dubai to play rugby sevens in
the World Cup. That’s terrific news and I need to speak
about that.
“Unfortunately I don’t speak very well in
English but I speak good Spanish - my second language is
Spanish because we are very near Spain and in this area [the
Haute Pyrenees] we speak a special language, a Patois called
Occitan which is very close to Spanish – and when I speak
with the Olympic movement I speak Spanish.
“A lot of time I speak Spanish and it is
important to promote this image. My job is not to work in
Dublin – we have a lot of people to do that – my job is to
promote rugby with the vision we have in other parts of the
world. To show that rugby is no longer any more just for the
gentlemen with a cup of tea. That’s the image that we had
before and we need to change that and to promote rugby
throughout the world.”
With that he offered up a refreshing drink,
and after pondering a request for tea I thought better of it
and opted instead for coffee. Changing world and all that.
So, could America be on the horizons of the
IRB?
“I don’t think so. America is very different.
The concept of sport in America is very different to
elsewhere in the world – it is totally closed. They only
have four sports: baseball, ice hockey, basketball and
American football. Canada is in a better position, that is a
definite possibility, yes, and so is Russia and the
Ukraine,” he adds.
More immediately he said the IRB was
concerned with integrating Argentina more fully into the top
level of international rugby – hence their inclusion
(together with Canada) in the current Autumn internationals
being played throughout Europe.
But Lapasset said there was more to
integration that just inclusion in tours and tournaments.
“The first thing we demanded was for
Argentina to become a more professional side and to be sure
that they have the capacity to promote the game properly.
They already play a good game and have good players,” he
said.
The president of the Argentinean Rugby Union
(UAR) Porfirio Carreras recently admitted that a complete
overhaul of their domestic rugby would be necessary before
inclusion in the Tri-Nations tournament, their ultimate
goal.
“We need to change our structure, divide our
rugby into amateur and professional and try to produce elite
players through the high performance centres,” said
Carreras.
This is a move the IRB have been pushing for,
the first step in moving up the international ladder for
last year’s RWC semi-finalists.
“We have now included Argentina in the top 10
Unions, but the second part is to promote Argentina in the
top tours and competitions in the world,” confirmed
Lapasset. That’s why Argentina were included in the November
tours of Europe and we have also opened discussions with the
South [hemisphere] because the place for Argentina is in the
south not in Europe.
“The tri-nations has only three nations. They
can change that to open a new market to include Argentina.
So need to open discussions to find out how best to
integrate Argentina and what process is possible to do that.
Also how long it would take to do that.
“The link is between South Africa and
Argentina. They have some solutions, some projects together,
but it is more difficult with Australia and New Zealand and
there is a long way to go,” he added.
Why the reticence?
“I don’t know exactly, but I know that
Australia and New Zealand hope to open relations with Japan
and Russia and parts of Asia. The Bledisloe Cup match was
held in Hong Kong and they need more money to create some
events in other parts of the world.”
So it’s a slowly, slowly process then?
“Yes,” replied Lapasset. “This is officially
the first step, and we are also creating an inter-hemisphere
tournament. This is already underway with money in place.”
Another changing aspect of rugby union is
that northern hemisphere money is now drawing the top rugby
league stars to convert, particularly in France where the
lack of salary caps is a huge incentive for players. The
relationship between the two codes has traditionally been
frosty at best, so I wondered if this was now thawing in the
modern rugby world.
“Yes, we have a lot of players switching –
from Australia in particular – but it is a different sport
and they can both co-exist. I remember when Sonny ‘Bill’
Williams came to France I received a lot of letters from
Australia saying ‘what are we doing?’ But we have no
exclusions.
“I remember 10-20 years ago we didn’t speak
with rugby league but this time has finished. It is a
different game, a different concept with a different
strategy, so we have no more stories between 15 and 13. My
predecessor was totally against rugby league but this time
is finished,” said Lapasset.
More pressing, in the meantime, is the
current dalliance with the ELVs which has provoked a wave of
criticism in both north and south hemispheres. So, how does
the IRB view the feedback so far?
“We defined the problem, the programme is in
place and we take the solution next year in March. Only then
do we decide what we are doing,” he explained.
|

Lapasset: "We don't play to win
the game" |
“We have two issues in this programme:
Firstly, in the south they say rugby needs more space,
speed, clarity and vision of the ball for spectators and TV,
and that we need to open the game. Secondly, in the north,
they said ‘no, rugby is fine, we need to continue with the
path of the game to fight each other’ and that technical is
more important than speed. We need to be more technical, and
speed is not part of the technique.
“There are two different cultures, two
different visions of the game, and when we speak about the
rules of rugby every union thinks ‘I am the best, I have the
best vision for rugby’ – it’s crazy,” he laments.
“The decision could be very difficult and we
probably have some big issues coming. I see that South
Africa is taking a different decision for the British and
Irish Lions tour, and it’s not the same vision as Australia
and New Zealand at this time.
“But I think we will start in the north and
play with the new rules and after that I’m sure evolution
will be possible. At the end of the day we need to be in the
middle of what we are doing and the end could be the final
solution, but it’s too early to say. But it’s important that
we decide that we need more creativity in games. In the
finals of the last two world cups in 2003 and 2007 there has
been just one and people have played for just not losing the
game; we don’t play to win the game with motion and
creativity. We need that.”
So, the much-maligned ELVs are here to stay
then, with the IRB initiative being driven by an
acknowledgement that defence had overridden attack in the
modern game.
“Yes. We talked to the coaches and they said
they played entertaining rugby at the start of the
tournament [the last world cup] but after that they became
careful and looked at the best process to make minimal risk
and win at the end of the day. Well, that’s not for rugby,
we need to be more creative and have the capacity for each
player to improve.
“I think it’s a good process to do that and
to explain that to the coaches. To say rugby is changing and
we need more space and capacity for players. At the end we
shall see how the best road is to do that. A lot of coaches
say we have more space – but this is good for the kickers
and we can’t let that happen all the time, it’s not rugby
it’s ping-pong. That is a part of the decision that we have
taken. More space is good, but not just to kick the ball and
run behind, no. Rugby is good to run with the ball and
create more passes.”
It is an honest opinion from a man devoted to
ensuring the safe development of a sport he loves. For
Lapasset rugby is more than a mere sport, it is a moral code
for behaviour and team togetherness. It seems that under his
stewardship that message is now reaching more potential
converts than ever before, leaving the sport as a whole
better placed to compete in an ever shrinking world.
Tea anyone?
Bernard Lapasset Interview Part I:
My Olympic Dream
Bernard Lapasset Interview
Part 2: My Hopes and Fears For The Game

|