"The whole point of rugby is that it is, first and foremost, a state of mind, a spirit" – Jean-Pierre Rives

Home | About Us | Contact Details | Sitemap  | Links 
 
 
French Rugby Club
Latest News
Features
Editor's Choice
Forum
Top 14
News
Results
Fixtures
Table
History
Columnists
Steve Thompson - new
Joe El-Abd - new
Paul Dearlove
Pro D2
News
Results & Fixtures
Table
Federale 1
Results
Tables
Heineken Cup
News
Results & Tables
European Challenge Cup
News
Results & Tables
International
International News
Club Guide

   

Add to favourites!

Subscribe to French Rugby Club by Email

 

 

 

 

Joe (El Abd) Blogs: Star turns and the glamour play - how to judge a performance

By Joe El Abd, 04 November 2009

Toulon flanker Joe El Abd
Team player: Joe El-Abd
© RCN Toulon

Toulon flanker and FRC columnist Joe El Abd this week asks how easy (or difficult) is it to judge an individual performance within a team sport.

One thing you learn quickly when you’re out in France is that the Midi Olympique published every Monday and Friday is French rugby’s equivalent to the bible. Each week the games are previewed and reviewed with all the top performances being singled out for praise.

As a professional rugby player you expect to get judged on a week to week basis and it's certainly the case out here in the Top 14. Players are awarded ‘etoiles’ (stars) for good performances and its always interesting to read how the reporters have viewed the match. For what is clear in a sport such as rugby is that judging how well a player has performed is no easy task. As a consequence everyone has his or her own opinions on what makes up a good performance and it always throws up much debate. So what do I think you need to look for when judging a performance?

For me the first determinant of whether a player has played well is how effectively he has performed his role within the team. This sounds a simple concept and it is, but when judging from the touchlines it is not always easy to know what role each player has been given to perform. This is because each team requires each position to perform different roles depending on their style of play.

For example, players roles can differ in the line-out, in different patterns of play or in the defensive structure. Therefore unless you’ve been privileged to have spent time inside the camp of a team, knowing the exact role of each player is not simple.  Without this inside knowledge would you from the stands be able to tell which player missed a call and therefore a lift at a lineout? Or would you know which player was supposed to clear the ruck when the team got turned over? I certainly don’t have all the answers but performing your role within the team certainly provides a basis on which a good performance can be built.

The next part to look for in a good performance is an absence of mistakes within a player's game. This may sound negative but a player surely can’t have played well if he has made numerous mistakes during the match, even if he did score the winning try. The problem with mistakes is that they only really get noticed if they lead to noticeable consequences for the team. Is there a difference between a missed tackle that lets the opposition score to one that does not? So for me when judging performance mistakes need to be taken into account. What you will find is that the best players rarely make errors during a game.

So I think that if a player has performed his role in the team and made very few errors, then he can be said to have performed well. What separates the good performances from the very good performances are the extra things often visible to those in the stands. The big tackle, the line-out steal, the great pass or the great break, the things that often get the crowd standing on their feet. The problem comes when you judge solely on these visible aspects of the game while forgetting about the first two building blocks already mentioned. Has a player performed well if he has scored a great try but missed four tackles during the match? Again I only have questions and not answers but what I have found is that the top players seem to get the building blocks right every week and more often than not finish off the performance with some style.

As you can see judging performances is not as simple as it seems, as there are always things to think about when watching a match. To make it easier I’m just going to stick to reading the Midi Olympique!

A bientot

Previous columns:
27.10.09 - Why I relish the role of 'gratteur', and the key to back row success
21.10.09 - 'My brothers think I'm mad when they see all my rugby scars'
07.10.09 - 'I keep telling them Rovigo is not Rome, but they're still excited'
28.09.09 - 'The three-part conundrum of winning away in France'
22.09.09 - 'There's more to Jonny than just kicking'
14.09.09 - Lesson number 1 - 'Pas de melée, pas de victoire
08.09.09 - 'The money's good, but so is the weather, the rugby and the crowds'

 


 
 
Home | About Us | Privacy Policy | Contact Details | Sitemap  | Links 

© Copyright FrenchRugbyClub.com. All rights reserved.