Paul Dearlove's exclusive
weekly column: Are 'les
etrangers' good for
French rugby?
05 February
2009
|

Un etranger
in a strange land:
Pau captain Paul Dearlove
|
In the latest of his exclusive
weekly columns for FRC, Pau captain Paul Dearlove
asks the tricky question of whether foreign players - of
which, of course, he is one - are good for French rugby and
the country's continued development of its future stars.
Foreign players in France are apparently
treading a fine line between being a good thing and too much
of a good thing. Bernard Laporte (former coach of Les
Bleus and now minister for sport) has publicly called
for a limiting of the number of foreign players in the
French Championships. So are there too many non French
players plying their trade in France?
Firstly, a little bit of background.
The main reason there are so many South
Africans and Pacific Islanders playing in France, and Europe
in general, is the Cotonou Agreement. You may have
heard of the Kolpak agreement which is the application of
Cotonou to professional sport.
Cotonou is an international trade agreement
designed to reduce poverty and aid sustainable development.
It allows nationals of countries considered to be
‘developing’ (this includes South Africa and the Pacific
Islands) freedom to work in the European Union.
So far so... confusing?
When trying to ‘aid development’ I’m not sure
the EU had professional sports in mind but hey, a loophole
is a loophole.
Racing Metro's former All Black fly-half
Andrew Mehrtens is probably the highest profile example of a
rugby player using his South African passport to avoid being
a foreign player (as he would be if he used his Kiwi
passport), but he is by no means alone. In the interest of
full disclosure – I consider myself an Australian but play
in France on my South African passport.
Having established that, here's another small
detour as we work back towards the original question...
The most hyped game of the French season so
far took place on the weekend when Stade Francais took on
Perpignan in Paris - the battle of Argentina's Juan Martin
Hernandez and New Zealand's Dan Carter. Around 80,000 people
filled Stade de France and there was talk of little else
that weekend. It is this kind of interest and attention that
rugby has craved. Certain players are now internationally
recognised and they help bring an extra thousand or even ten
thousand through the turnstiles. Having high profile
players, even if they are foreigners, is clearly a savvy
business decision, and money coming into the game (via
sponsors and spectators) has to be good for the sport.
The other side of the
argument says that the local talent doesn’t develop if it
can’t get a game, and there is some truth to this.
The influx of high profile players has left
some local players warming the bench, and the fact that
Toulouse scrum-half Jean-Baptiste Elissalde has not made the
French 22 for the weekend has clearly not been helped by him
having to play second fiddle at club level to former All
Black Byron Kelleher. While this isn’t ideal for Elissalde,
the more pertinent problem is when teams fill their teams
with journeymen because they think it is in the best way to
fulfill their ambitions.
Teams like Aurillac in the Pro D2 regularly
take the field with less than 20% of the team speaking
French as their native language. On the other hand, though,
last season they finished top of the Federale 1 and were
promoted, and as recently as three weeks ago were sitting 2nd
in the Pro D2.
Clearly some middle ground needs to be found
and, for once, I haven’t got an answer and it isn’t really
in my interests to find one.
In fact, I do have an answer but I’m keeping
it a secret until I retire. Until then, like a true
Frenchman, I demand we keep the status quo.
|